To facilitate maximum likelihood estimation for Box-Cox models, several authors have suggested dividing the dependent variable by its sample geometric mean. This paper points out previously unmentioned drawbacks of this 'recalling.' First, the 'resealed' model is not actually equivalent to the untransformed one, so that the procedure involves more than a unit change. Second, there is no clear interpretation of the parameters after such resealing. The authors suggest an interpretation but find that the usual formulas for standard errors and confidence intervals are not asymptotically valid. Only tests for zero coefficients are valid. Thirdly, the authors discuss the appropriate way of measuring elasticities in such models. Copyright 1994 by MIT Press.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 76 (1994) Issue (Month): 3 (August) Pages: 571-75 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)