John Barry (John Barry is Reader in Politics at the School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy, Queens University, Belfast. His recent publications include Environment and Social Theory, 2-super-nd edition (2007); and "Towards a Model of Green Political Economy: From Ecological modernisation to Economic Security", International Journal of Green Economics 1 (3/4) (2007). He is the co-author, with Peter Doran, of "Refining Green Political Economy: From Ecological Modernisation to Economic Security and Sufficiency", Analyse & Kritik 28 (3) (2006); and co-editor, with Robyn Eckersley, of The Nation-State and the Global Ecological Crisis (2005).) Geraint Ellis (Geraint Ellis is Senior Lecturer in the School of Planning, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Queens University, Belfast. His recent publications include "Many Ways to Say 'No', Different Ways to Say 'Yes': Applying Q-Methodology to Understand Public Acceptance of Wind Farm Proposals," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 (4) (2007), co-authored with John Barry and Clive Robinson; and "Reparation or Retribution: An Investigation into Regulatory Compliance in Planning," Environment and Planning A 37 (4) (2005), co-authored with Stephen McKay.) Clive Robinson (Clive Robinson is a PhD student at Queen's University, Belfast, and was research assistant on the Renewable Energy and Discourses of Objection Project from which this paper emerged. His main research interest is the application and development of Q-Methodology and increasing the profile of human subjectivity within sustainable decision making. He is the co-author, with John Barry and Geraint Ellis, of "Many Ways to Say 'No', Different Ways to Say 'Yes': Applying Q-Methodology to Understand Public Acceptance of Wind Farm Proposals," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 (4) (2007).)
Abstract
A key obstacle to the wide-scale development of renewable energy is that public acceptability of wind energy cannot be taken for granted when wind energy moves from abstract support to local implementation. Drawing on a case study of opposition to the siting of a proposed off-shore wind farm in Northern Ireland, we offer a rhetorical analysis of a series of representative documents drawn from government, media, pro- and anti-wind energy sources, which identifies and interprets a number of discourses of objection and support. The analysis indicates that the key issue in terms of the transition to a renewable energy economy has little to do with the technology itself. Understanding the different nuances of pro- and anti-wind energy discourses highlights the importance of thinking about new ways of looking at these conflicts. These include adopting a "conflict resolution" approach and "upstreaming" public involvement in the decision-making process and also the counter-productive strategy of assuming that objection is based on ignorance (which can be solved by information) or NIMBY thinking (which can be solved by moral arguments about overcoming "free riders"). (c) 2008 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.