IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v16y2021i4p659-689.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Costs and Benefits of Early College High Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Drew Atchison

    (American Institutes for Research Arlington, VA 22202)

  • Kristina L. Zeiser

    (American Institutes for Research Arlington, VA 22202)

  • Salma Mohammed
  • David S. Knight

    (College of Education University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195)

  • Jesse Levin

    (American Institutes for Research San Mateo, CA 94403)

Abstract

Early colleges (ECs) provide high school students access to college coursework with the goal of increasing postsecondary opportunities for traditionally underrepresented students. We examine the impact of ECs on postsecondary attainment, calculate the resulting monetary benefits, and then estimate the per-student costs of ECs compared with traditional high schools to assess costs and benefits. Our findings indicate that students enrolling in ECs in our study are more likely to attend college and graduate with an associate's or bachelor's degree. Increased educational attainment from EC enrollment results in lifetime benefits of almost $58,000 per student. ECs cost approximately $950 more than traditional high schools per student per year, resulting in an overall cost of $3,800 more per student across four years of high school. Comparing benefits to cost, we estimate a net present value (NPV) of $54,000 per student and a benefit–cost ratio of 15.1. Even when using conservative estimates of costs (upper bound) and benefits (lower bound), we calculate an NPV of over $27,000 and a benefit–cost ratio of 4.6. These results indicate that investment in ECs pays off through increased earnings for EC students, increased tax revenue, and decreased government spending.

Suggested Citation

  • Drew Atchison & Kristina L. Zeiser & Salma Mohammed & David S. Knight & Jesse Levin, 2021. "The Costs and Benefits of Early College High Schools," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 16(4), pages 659-689, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:16:y:2021:i:4:p:659-689
    DOI: 10.1162/edfp_a_00310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00310
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/edfp_a_00310?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:16:y:2021:i:4:p:659-689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.