IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v15y2020i2p292-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gray University Degrees: Experimental Evidence from India

Author

Listed:
  • Tanmoy Majilla

    (The International Institute of Social Studies Erasmus University Rotterdam 2015 AX Den Haag, Netherlands)

  • Matthias Rieger

    (The International Institute of Social Studies Erasmus University Rotterdam 2015 AX Den Haag, Netherlands)

Abstract

Scams involving university degrees are flourishing in many emerging markets. Using a resume experiment in India, this paper studies the impact of gray degrees, or potentially bought academic credentials from questionable universities, on callback rates to job applications. The experiment varied the type of degree (no, gray, and authentic) in online applications to entry-level jobs that require no university qualification. We find that gray degrees increase callback rates by 42 percent or 8 percentage points relative to having no degree. However, we also document that gray degrees fare on average worse than authentic degrees. These empirical patterns are consistent with a model where employers have beliefs about the authenticity of degrees and are discounting gray-degree universities probabilistically. We discuss our findings with respect to the Indian context.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanmoy Majilla & Matthias Rieger, 2020. "Gray University Degrees: Experimental Evidence from India," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 15(2), pages 292-309, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:292-309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/edfp_a_00268
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:292-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.