IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v40y2023i1p174-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Assessment of Budgeting and Budgetary Management system of South Sudan: The Case of the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Matur Tieng

    (MSc. in Economics, University of Juba, South Sudan.)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the budgetary management system by the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning to manage the budget effectively and efficiently to meet the financial objective of the government of South Sudan. The study undertook a critical review of all financial policy documents including the appropriation bills, the Public Financial Management and Accountability Act 2011, and other assessment reports conducted by the other individuals and institutions on the financial management system of the government of South Sudan. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect first-hand information from the spending agencies of the government about how the budget is being managed on their behalf. And to find out whether the current budget management system meets the expectations of the spending agencies. Among the major trending issues found during this study were lack of transparency in the budget management, lack of inclusive participation of all stakeholders in the budget planning, weak internal and external control mechanism, lack of qualified staff in the accounts and budget departments, lack of timely and adequate budgetary information sharing, and failure of the parliament to exercise its oversight role on the planning and implementation of the budget, among others. The study concluded that significant reform in the financial management system in South Sudan is needed, as well as the deployment of qualified accountants to all spending agencies. This will ensure proper budget discipline among all spending agencies since the qualified workforce is at the driving will of the financial system. The Treasury Single Account be implemented without any objection by some spending agencies such as the security sector. And the custodian of the system be the Central Bank of South Sudan since it is the fiscal agent of the government.

Suggested Citation

  • Matur Tieng, 2023. "A Systematic Assessment of Budgeting and Budgetary Management system of South Sudan: The Case of the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 40(1), pages 174-183, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:40:y:2023:i:1:p:174-183
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v40i1.6499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/6499/3056
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/6499
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v40i1.6499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2005. "Angola : Public Expenditure Management and Financial Accountability," World Bank Publications - Reports 8514, The World Bank Group.
    2. World Bank, 2005. "Public Expenditure Management and Financial Accountability in Niger," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7278, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mr. Jean-Claude Nachega & Mr. Thomson Fontaine, 2006. "Economic Growth and Total Factor Productivity in Niger," IMF Working Papers 2006/208, International Monetary Fund.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Budgeting; Budgetary Control; Effective management; South Sudan budgeting system;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:40:y:2023:i:1:p:174-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.