IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v21y2021i1p345-363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation Instrument Development for Scientific Writing Instruction with A Constructivism Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Supriyadi Supriyadi

    (Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop evaluation instruments for scientific writing instruction with a constructivism approach. The development of evaluation instruments is important to provide valid and reliable measurement to measure the success rate of scientific writing instruction with a constructivism approach. In order to achieve these objectives, the combined models of development, i.e. 4D and RDR were used. The implementation of the development consisted of four stages, namely the preliminary study, define, design, and product development. The research data were in the form of quantitative and qualitative data and the data sources were the students, lecturers, practitioners, and experts in relevant fields of study. Data analysis technique was the domain technique and t test statistical technique for related samples. Based on the results, the obtained development product in the form of the evaluation of the instruction of writing scientific papers were valid and reliable. The development product consisted of four types of evaluation devices, the assessment rubrics, portfolios, observation sheets, and learning journal. Based on the results of the four development products, the effectiveness test was valid and reliable so that it can be used to conduct evaluation of learning to write scientific papers with constructivism approach, both for the evaluation of the process and the evaluation of the learning outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Supriyadi Supriyadi, 2021. "Evaluation Instrument Development for Scientific Writing Instruction with A Constructivism Approach," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 21(1), pages 345-363, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:345-363
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v21i1.3877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/3877/1410
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/3877
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v21i1.3877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    development; evaluation instrument; learning; writing scientific composition; constructivism; development product;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:345-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.