IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v17y2021i1p510-523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taboo words in hate speech through Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Azizah Husda

    (Universitas Prima Indonesia)

  • Elza Leyli Lisnora Saragih

    (Universitas HKBP Nomensen)

  • Mulyadi

    (Universitas Sumatera Utara)

Abstract

This research is on taboo words used in hate speech through social media to find out the classification of taboo words and to describe the social functions of taboo words in hate speech. The method applies descriptive qualitative by describing taboo words. The data were obtained through documents from social media about recently updated hate speech. The synthesis of some previous theories and relevant studies support the research. The approaches used is socio-semantics as the combination of both sociolinguistics and semantics, because it studies the meanings and perspectives of using taboo words among society in hate speech. The findings showed that there are taboo words classified into epithets, profanity, vulgarity, obscenity, cursing and supernatural beings. The functions of using taboo words were also found to draw people's attention, to show contempt, to provoke, and to mock authority. This research finally provides some contributions and references for any further research related to the use of taboo words within any language and also as communication guidance especially for speakers to avoid using taboo words which lead to hate speech.

Suggested Citation

  • Azizah Husda & Elza Leyli Lisnora Saragih & Mulyadi, 2021. "Taboo words in hate speech through Social Media," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 17(1), pages 510-523, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:17:y:2021:i:1:p:510-523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/2834/1074
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/2834
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Taboo; Words; Hate Speech; Social Media;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:17:y:2021:i:1:p:510-523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.