IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/aaequi/v2y2012i1p42-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policies to combat centralism in Romania. Lobbying, advocacy and participatory democracy

Author

Listed:
  • Mina Simona

    (Ovidius University of Constanta)

Abstract

Applying total decentralization requires efficiency in itself, because the administration-citizen relationship will move closer towards that companyclient relation (initiator-agent type relationship). Through decentralization the level of a state’s democracy increases, resulting in a basis for proper governance. Transparency and responsibility of the deciding factors is improved, due to a high level of control by the public sector’s beneficiaries at the local level. A major part of the feedback offered to the public administration will be from the citizens and the civil societies, which will improve cohesion and social capital on a local level. As a corollary to the afore mentioned, decentralization’s role is to support development, first of all by a stronger motivation of the citizen’s in order to draw more resources for projects, which will have a direct impact on them and second, by focusing on the groups that find themselves in vulnerable situations. Enhancing local democracy end empowering communities in decision-making are top priorities of European political agendas. However, the abundance and heterogeneity of existing examples of inclusive practices have provoked an ongoing debate on the implications and outcomes that deliberation might generate under specific conditions. Among these practices, urban regeneration is usually welcomed as a vehicle for engaging communities in public-decision making; nevertheless, the specific participative settings designed to implement those programs tend to generate peculiar communicative dynamics, which can in turn lead to unexpected results. The specific manner in which participation is set up by local governments does influence empowerment results

Suggested Citation

  • Mina Simona, 2012. "Policies to combat centralism in Romania. Lobbying, advocacy and participatory democracy," Ars Aequi, Universul Juridic, vol. 2(1), pages 42-53, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:aaequi:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:42-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revista.drept-ovidius.ro/index.php/arsaequi/article/view/84
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://revista.drept-ovidius.ro/index.php/arsaequi/article/view/84
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    decentralization; administration-citizen relationship; democracy end empowering communities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:aaequi:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:42-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tanase Tasente (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.