IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/yenvxx/v23y2018i1p23-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plantation Soilscapes: Initial and Cumulative Impacts of Colonial Agriculture in Antigua, West Indies

Author

Listed:
  • E. Christian Wells
  • Suzanna M. Pratt
  • Georgia L. Fox
  • Peter E. Siegel
  • Nicholas P. Dunning
  • A. Reginald Murphy

Abstract

This paper examines physical, chemical, and biological properties of soils and sediments from landforms in eastern Antigua, West Indies, to better understand the long-term consequences of colonial plantation agriculture for soil health. Plantation farming played a central role in the history of Caribbean societies, economies, and environments since the seventeenth century. In Antigua, the entire island was variably dedicated to agricultural pursuits (mostly sugarcane monoculture) from the mid-1600s until independence from the United Kingdom in 1981, when most commercial cultivation ceased. Today’s soilscapes are highly degraded, although it is unknown what the role of the island’s plantation legacy has played in this process. Our research combines geoarchaeological survey and sampling, sediment core analysis, and historical archival research to model the initial and cumulative impacts of the plantation industry on the island. We focus on the region surrounding Betty’s Hope, the island’s first large-scale sugarcane plantation in operation from 1674 to 1944. We find that current erosion and degradation issues experienced by today’s farmers are not attributable to intensive plantation farming alone, but rather are part of a complex mosaic of human-environmental interactions that include abandonment of engineered landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Christian Wells & Suzanna M. Pratt & Georgia L. Fox & Peter E. Siegel & Nicholas P. Dunning & A. Reginald Murphy, 2018. "Plantation Soilscapes: Initial and Cumulative Impacts of Colonial Agriculture in Antigua, West Indies," Environmental Archaeology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 23-35, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:yenvxx:v:23:y:2018:i:1:p:23-35
    DOI: 10.1080/14614103.2017.1309806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14614103.2017.1309806
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14614103.2017.1309806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:yenvxx:v:23:y:2018:i:1:p:23-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/yenv .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.