IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v116y2023i4p198-205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of maker technologies on classroom learning outcomes: A mixed methods explanatory study

Author

Listed:
  • Colby Tofel-Grehl
  • David Feldon
  • Soojeong Jeong
  • Kristin Searle
  • Tyler Hansen
  • Brenda Bennett

Abstract

The integration of making activities in classrooms provides a crucial opportunity for all students to gain equitable participation access to learning activities. However, for making to be incorporated into more classrooms, teachers must be adequately prepared with relevant knowledge and skills. This study is the first to compare the science learning outcomes associated with making to those stemming from standard learning curricula and experiences within a classroom setting. We examine the learning outcomes of 219 students across multiple sections of one teacher’s 9th-grade science classes. While five sections of students were taught using the school’s standard learning curriculum, four sections of students engaged in an integrated maker curriculum. A mixed methods approach offers a comprehensive look at the affordances and limitations of maker-based classroom science instruction by coupling student science learning outcomes with student and teacher reflections on instruction and learning. Findings indicate that students had better learning outcomes in science class when learning occurred through maker technologies than the school’s standard learning curriculum.

Suggested Citation

  • Colby Tofel-Grehl & David Feldon & Soojeong Jeong & Kristin Searle & Tyler Hansen & Brenda Bennett, 2023. "Impacts of maker technologies on classroom learning outcomes: A mixed methods explanatory study," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(4), pages 198-205, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:116:y:2023:i:4:p:198-205
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2023.2239185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2023.2239185
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2023.2239185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:116:y:2023:i:4:p:198-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.