IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v115y2022i2p122-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Force and motion misconceptions’ pliability, the case of Moroccan high school students

Author

Listed:
  • Tariq Bouzid
  • Fatiha Kaddari
  • Hassane Darhmaoui

Abstract

This work investigates science major students’ misconceptions about “force and motion.” Stratified-convenience sampling method has been conducted on 232 Moroccan high school students. Using Force Concept Inventory (FCI), we examined all known misconceptions listed in the original article by Hestenes et al. (1992, Phys. Teach. 30, 141–151) and carefully highlighted the most dominant ones. Our study suggests that most Moroccan high school students do not have a “Newtonian understanding” about the concept of force and motion and carry a pre-Aristotelian conceptual understanding. Our results show that misconceptions about force and motion slightly decrease among students in upper grades. Nonetheless, no significant correlations were found pertaining to grade, age, or gender. We compare our findings to earlier works on the subject in Morocco as well as in other countries. The data and its analysis we provide in this work help to better understand students’ misconceptions and the reasoning behind them. They could serve as a guideline for developing appropriate didactic methods and tools to position and remediate students’ conceptions about force and motion. It could trigger further research on the subject and its implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Tariq Bouzid & Fatiha Kaddari & Hassane Darhmaoui, 2022. "Force and motion misconceptions’ pliability, the case of Moroccan high school students," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(2), pages 122-132, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:115:y:2022:i:2:p:122-132
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2022.2064802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2022.2064802
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2022.2064802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:115:y:2022:i:2:p:122-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.