IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v115y2022i2p111-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Against sedentary school environment: Rethinking the aims of education through physical education

Author

Listed:
  • Jodie Leiss
  • Jeong-Hee Kim

Abstract

Physical activity is essential for children’s current and future health, but most do not get their recommended daily 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity. Schools are an ideal environment for physical activity since students spend most of their waking hours at school. In this paper, we inquire into a sedentary school environment and its collateral impact on student learning in light of the school experience of Hannah. Grounded in Merleau-Ponty’s theory of body and embodiment and Dewey’s theory of experience in education, the purpose of this narrative inquiry is to challenge an increasingly sedentary environment that undermines the role of body, hence providing a mis-educative experience. In so doing, we intend to raise awareness of the collateral impact of sedentary education on students and rethink the aims of education for the 21st century to foster the child as a whole embodied being. We suggest three aims of education: first, health as the foundation to develop the whole child; second, adding the fifth R, Rhythm, to Doll’s four R’s of richness, recursion, relation, and rigor; and finally, understanding what it means to be physically literate.

Suggested Citation

  • Jodie Leiss & Jeong-Hee Kim, 2022. "Against sedentary school environment: Rethinking the aims of education through physical education," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(2), pages 111-121, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:115:y:2022:i:2:p:111-121
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2022.2064801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2022.2064801
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2022.2064801?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:115:y:2022:i:2:p:111-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.