IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v113y2020i4p303-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative learning with scientific approach and multiple intelligence: Its impact toward math learning achievement

Author

Listed:
  • Rizqona Maharani
  • Marsigit Marsigit
  • Ariyadi Wijaya

Abstract

This study examined the effect of collaborative learning with a scientific approach (SA) on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the students’ multiple intelligences. This study compared two types of collaborative learning models, Three Steps Interview (TSI), and Think Pair Share (TPS). The participants of this study were grade 8 students of Secondary Schools in Sukoharjo, Central Java, Indonesia (N = 262). This study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3 × 3 factorial design. The results of the study can be concluded as follows. (1) TSI with a scientific approach got better math learning achievement than TPS with a scientific approach and classical with a scientific approach. Besides, TPS with a scientific approach got better learning achievement than classical with a scientific approach. (2) Students with logical-mathematical intelligence got better math learning achievement than students with linguistic intelligence and students with interpersonal intelligence, students with linguistic intelligence got better math learning achievement than students with interpersonal intelligence.

Suggested Citation

  • Rizqona Maharani & Marsigit Marsigit & Ariyadi Wijaya, 2020. "Collaborative learning with scientific approach and multiple intelligence: Its impact toward math learning achievement," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(4), pages 303-316, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:113:y:2020:i:4:p:303-316
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2020.1806196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2020.1806196
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2020.1806196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:113:y:2020:i:4:p:303-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.