IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v112y2019i4p512-527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expository text difficulty for elementary emerging bilingual students: Does it matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Beth Kelly

Abstract

The author explored text difficulty for third-grade bilingual students reading below grade level. In six small-group discussions, students read and discussed informational texts matched to their reading levels, and in six other sessions they read and discussed texts one year ahead of their reading levels. The alternating treatment design and qualitative analysis of transcripts revealed different text levels have both advantages and drawbacks. Findings included the following: Group 1 had more inferential or interpretive responses with matched texts and Group 2 had more inferential or interpretive responses with difficult texts. Most students participated evenly regardless of text difficulty. However, two students talked more when discussing matched texts. Text difficulty did not affect comprehension for anyone except one student, and for him it only had an effect on three of 12 days. Half of the students’ fluency scores benefited from matched texts. The other half read difficult texts with similar fluency to matched texts.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Beth Kelly, 2019. "Expository text difficulty for elementary emerging bilingual students: Does it matter?," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(4), pages 512-527, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:112:y:2019:i:4:p:512-527
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2019.1573796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2019.1573796
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2019.1573796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:112:y:2019:i:4:p:512-527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.