IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v112y2019i4p463-472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More student trust, more self-regulation strategy? Exploring the effects of self-regulatory climate on self-regulated learning

Author

Listed:
  • John Chi Kin Lee
  • Zhi Hong Wan
  • Sammy King Fai Hui
  • Po Yuk Ko

Abstract

Self-regulated learning has been one of the important areas in educational research. The authors adopted structural equation modeling to explore and compare the impacts of three aspects of self-regulatory climate (i.e., academic emphasis, teacher trust, and student trust) on three features of self-regulated learning (i.e., self-efficacy, intrinsic motive, and self-regulation strategy). The results revealed both direct effects of academic emphasis on students’ use of self-regulation strategy, and indirect effects mediated by self-efficacy and intrinsic motive. Teacher trust has a positive impact on self-efficacy. While student trust has a positive impact on intrinsic motive, its relationship with self-regulation strategy is negative. Significant differences in school levels and gender were identified. The findings indicate that students in different cultures may have different expectations for teachers’ support in learning, which in turn influence the relationship between student trust in teachers and the use of self-regulation strategy. Implications for cultivating self-regulated learners are discussed in the article.

Suggested Citation

  • John Chi Kin Lee & Zhi Hong Wan & Sammy King Fai Hui & Po Yuk Ko, 2019. "More student trust, more self-regulation strategy? Exploring the effects of self-regulatory climate on self-regulated learning," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(4), pages 463-472, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:112:y:2019:i:4:p:463-472
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2018.1553840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2018.1553840
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2018.1553840?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:112:y:2019:i:4:p:463-472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.