IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/veecee/v21y2019i4p353-377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of regulatory focus and cognitive style in business angels’ evaluation of an investment opportunity

Author

Listed:
  • Sanda Franić
  • Mateja Drnovšek

Abstract

This paper investigates how two cognitive mechanisms of business angels – regulatory focus and cognitive style – contribute to the process of evaluating an investment opportunity. Analyzing both qualitative and quantitative data collected from an international sample of business angels, indicates that both promotion and prevention regulatory foci are directly associated with the greater likelihood of a business angel positively evaluating an opportunity, and that planning cognitive style moderates these relationships. This research contributes to the existing literature on the phases of business angels’ investment process. The findings are also important for understanding the cognitive underpinnings of an early evaluation of an investment opportunity. Prior research has suggested that a business angel’s early evaluation of an investment opportunity critically influences success in raising equity financing, which is of critical importance for start-up firms in overcoming the liability of newness in their early stages of development.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanda Franić & Mateja Drnovšek, 2019. "The role of regulatory focus and cognitive style in business angels’ evaluation of an investment opportunity," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 353-377, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:veecee:v:21:y:2019:i:4:p:353-377
    DOI: 10.1080/13691066.2019.1599191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13691066.2019.1599191
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13691066.2019.1599191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:veecee:v:21:y:2019:i:4:p:353-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TVEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.