IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v66y2020i1p3-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing real options based on linear loss functions and conditional value at risk

Author

Listed:
  • Kyongsun Kim
  • Chan S. Park

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to expand real option analysis out of the realm of pure financial option pricing techniques. To overcome many of the well-known concerns by adopting the financial option pricing techniques for modeling real options problems such as replicating portfolio concept, geometric Brownian motion as underlying stochastic process, and estimating project volatility, we propose an alternative real option valuation based on the loss function approach. The option value determined by the loss function approach is equivalent to the expected value of perfect information (EVPI) in decision analysis. It basically sets the upper bound of risk premium to pay in retaining the options. In practice, many firms utilize the concept of Value at Risk to manage their portfolio risk. If a firm sets a target VAR, then we may be able to link this VAR in refining the actual risk premium to pay in hedging the risk embedded in the investment. With this practice in mind, we present a logic to figure out an appropriate amount of real option premium to pay for a given level of risk tolerance. A comprehensive example is presented to demonstrate the computational procedures as well as economic interpretations on the outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyongsun Kim & Chan S. Park, 2020. "Pricing real options based on linear loss functions and conditional value at risk," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(1), pages 3-26, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:66:y:2020:i:1:p:3-26
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2020.1867273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1867273
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1867273?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:66:y:2020:i:1:p:3-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.