IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v61y2016i3p244-261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing incremental cost-efficiency of eco-footprint saving measures for school buildings: The case of the Inner Mongolia region in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaying Teng
  • Xianguo Wu
  • Yawei Qin
  • Tieming Hou
  • Limao Zhang

Abstract

Reducing energy and resource consumption as well as emissions by building projects are important goals in sustainable development of modern society. In this article, a method based on the concept of life-cycle ecological footprint is proposed to assess the efficiency of the incremental cost brought about by eco-footprint saving measures taken in building projects. This method is then utilized to provide guidelines for school building decision makers to select design plans with higher ecological and financial efficiency. In this method, a set of eco-footprint models is developed to compute the efficiency of incremental cost. Two indices are presented and adopted for assessing the life-cycle incremental cost-efficiency of eco-footprint-saving measures: the life-cycle eco-efficiency index and financial efficiency index for per unit incremental cost. The procedure for applying this method to assessing projects aimed at improving the efficiency of building energy consumption is also introduced. A case study of a school building in China is used to demonstrate the features of this method and the advantages of adopting the method. The results show that this method helps to identify inefficient design plans and provide an effective tool for decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaying Teng & Xianguo Wu & Yawei Qin & Tieming Hou & Limao Zhang, 2016. "Assessing incremental cost-efficiency of eco-footprint saving measures for school buildings: The case of the Inner Mongolia region in China," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(3), pages 244-261, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:61:y:2016:i:3:p:244-261
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2015.1041662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2015.1041662
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2015.1041662?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:61:y:2016:i:3:p:244-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.