IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/usppxx/v9y2022i1p20-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Graphical Measures Summarizing the Inequality of Income of Two Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua Landon
  • Joseph Gastwirth

Abstract

Recently, Gastwirth proposed two transformations p∗(q) and m∗(q) of the Lorenz curve, which calculates the proportion of a population, cumulated from the poorest or middle, respectively, needed to have the same amount of income as top 100q% . Economists and policy makers are often interested in the comparative status of two groups, for example, females versus males or minority versus majority. This article adapts and extends the concept underlying the p∗(q) and m∗(q) curves to provide analogous curves comparing the relative status of two groups. Now one calculates the proportion of the minority group, cumulated from the bottom or middle needed to have the same total income as the top qth fraction of the majority group (after adjusting for sample size). The areas between these curves and the line of equality are analogous to the Gini index. The methodology is used to illustrate the change in the degree of inequality between males and females, as well as between black and white males, in the United States between 2000 and 2017, and can be used to examine disparities between the expenditures on health of minorities and white people.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua Landon & Joseph Gastwirth, 2022. "Graphical Measures Summarizing the Inequality of Income of Two Groups," Statistics and Public Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 20-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:usppxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:20-25
    DOI: 10.1080/2330443X.2021.2016084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/2330443X.2021.2016084
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/2330443X.2021.2016084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:usppxx:v:9:y:2022:i:1:p:20-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uspp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.