IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ujbmxx/v61y2023i5p2261-2301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Getting to the one: Prioritizing an idea set using preference-based decision-specific heuristics

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel R. Clark
  • Matthias A. Tietz
  • Maya Kumar

Abstract

We propose and test a process where potential entrepreneurs (PEs) prioritize a venture idea consideration set using preference-based decision-specific heuristics to assess idea feasibility and desirability. We test our hypotheses through two studies with PEs. The first experiment shows that prioritization occurs, with 113 of 122 PEs voluntarily changing a randomized list of their ideated ventures into a rank-ordered priority list of potential opportunities. Second, we employ a novel “equivocal forced-choice” conjoint design with 250 PEs. We find empirical support that PEs prioritize via relative preferences for experience-based knowledge, strong social ties, and low risk/low reward venture ideas. We contribute to the entrepreneurship literature by theorizing and providing evidence of a prioritization stage for multiple idea sets before evaluation. Further, we demonstrate the influence of individual and social network factors on prioritization and expand our understanding of how PEs conceptualize risk in venturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel R. Clark & Matthias A. Tietz & Maya Kumar, 2023. "Getting to the one: Prioritizing an idea set using preference-based decision-specific heuristics," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(5), pages 2261-2301, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:61:y:2023:i:5:p:2261-2301
    DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2022.2082454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00472778.2022.2082454
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00472778.2022.2082454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:61:y:2023:i:5:p:2261-2301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ujbm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.