IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ujbmxx/v60y2022i4p859-891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived success of hybrid microorganizations in a contested category

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Bicho
  • Ralitza Nikolaeva
  • Fernando A. F. Ferreira
  • Carmen Lages

Abstract

The organizational literature privileges objective performance indicators often selected by researchers. There is scarce research focusing on legitimacy-challenged hybrid and microorganizations and on perceived success under exigent conditions. To address this scarcity, this study, conducted among complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) microorganizations, explores success as a subjective measure originating from managers’ perceptions. For the purpose, it integrates cognitive mapping and multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA)—a methodological contribution to construct a subjective-success framework that can be helpful for contested hybrid microorganizations. Seven factors emerged, of which human capital is recognized as critical, while external factors are considered unimportant.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Bicho & Ralitza Nikolaeva & Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Carmen Lages, 2022. "Perceived success of hybrid microorganizations in a contested category," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(4), pages 859-891, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:60:y:2022:i:4:p:859-891
    DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2020.1740536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00472778.2020.1740536
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00472778.2020.1740536?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:60:y:2022:i:4:p:859-891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ujbm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.