IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v56y2024i4p424-436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The drop box location problem

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Schmidt
  • Laura A. Albert

Abstract

For decades, voting-by-mail and the use of ballot drop boxes has substantially grown within the USA, and in response, many USA election officials have added drop boxes to their voting infrastructure. However, existing guidance for locating drop boxes is limited. In this article, we introduce an integer programming model, the Drop Box Location Problem (DBLP), to locate drop boxes. The DBLP considers criteria of cost, voter access, and risk. The cost of the drop box system is determined by the fixed cost of adding drop boxes and the operational cost of a collection tour by a bipartisan team who regularly collects ballots from selected locations. The DBLP utilizes covering sets to ensure each voter is in close proximity to a drop box and incorporates a novel measure of access to measure the ability to use multiple voting pathways to vote. The DBLP is shown to be NP-hard, and we introduce a heuristic to generate a large number of feasible solutions for policy makers to select from a posteriori. Using a real-world case study of Milwaukee, WI, U.S., we study the benefits of the DBLP. The results demonstrate that the proposed optimization model identifies drop box locations that perform well across multiple criteria. The results also demonstrate that the trade-off between cost, access, and risk is non-trivial, which supports the use of the proposed optimization-based approach to select drop box locations.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Schmidt & Laura A. Albert, 2024. "The drop box location problem," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 424-436, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:56:y:2024:i:4:p:424-436
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2023.2213754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2023.2213754
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2023.2213754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:56:y:2024:i:4:p:424-436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.