IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v56y2024i3p374-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-criteria classification of reward collaboration proposals

Author

Listed:
  • Annibal Parracho Sant’Anna
  • Luiz Octávio Gavião
  • Tiago Lezan Sant’Anna

Abstract

This article develops a mechanism for automatically classifying rewarded collaboration proposals. The research’s purpose is to increase transparency in the rewarded collaboration process, thereby inviting more collaboration proposals, to aid in the fight against criminal organizations. The research focuses on critical facets of the public security system and of the organized crime in Brazil. Through rewarded collaboration, a new approach to plea bargaining is achieved that helps detect, disrupt, and ultimately dismantle illicit operations. This multi-criteria approach enables the consideration of the interests of detainees, the priorities of police institutions, and the perspective of the community. This approach results in the formation of a holistic understanding of the issue, taking into account the costs and benefits to society of punishing defendants whose guilt can be established. Composition of Probabilistic Preferences Trichotomic is the multi-criteria method employed to take imprecision into consideration while performing classification into predetermined classes. It enables the evaluation of each proposal independently. This boosts the system’s objectivity and consequently its attractiveness. Taking the interaction between the criteria into consideration, the analysis naturally applies to any number of evaluation criteria and individuals involved in the investigated crimes. Novel forms of interaction modeling are compared in practical instances.

Suggested Citation

  • Annibal Parracho Sant’Anna & Luiz Octávio Gavião & Tiago Lezan Sant’Anna, 2024. "Multi-criteria classification of reward collaboration proposals," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 374-384, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:56:y:2024:i:3:p:374-384
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2023.2173368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2023.2173368
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2023.2173368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:56:y:2024:i:3:p:374-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.