IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v55y2023i6p574-587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extracting the wisdom of a smaller crowd from dependent quantile judgments

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanyuan Lei
  • Chen Wang

Abstract

The task of this article is to harness the wisdom of a crowd without calibration. We assume each expert to form predictions by linearly combining various information cues inspired by the lens model, and use Gaussian process to account for sampling and judgmental errors in quantile judgments. Without knowing the experts’ observed information cues, we develop a three-step estimation algorithm to factor quantile judgments into “variable profiles” (latent cues underlying each variable of interest) and “expert profiles” (each expert’s weights over these cues). We can inquire about expert similarity using their weights of the latent cues, which preserve the same clustering results as the actual weights of the observed cues up to a full-rank linear transform. We can then depict the diversity and dependency among experts explicitly and retain a subcrowd by picking delegates from each subgroup of experts based on the estimated weights. Simulation and case studies demonstrate that a subcrowd selected this way can represent the entire expert panel well.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanyuan Lei & Chen Wang, 2023. "Extracting the wisdom of a smaller crowd from dependent quantile judgments," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(6), pages 574-587, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:55:y:2023:i:6:p:574-587
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2022.2086326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2022.2086326
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2022.2086326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:55:y:2023:i:6:p:574-587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.