IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v55y2023i12p1230-1241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study of two menus of contracts for outsourcing the maintenance function of a process having a linear failure rate

Author

Listed:
  • Andy Alexander
  • Yanjun Li
  • Robert Plante

Abstract

One of the most frequently outsourced functions in business is maintenance. A model for the design of an incentive-based maintenance outsourcing contract has been proposed under the assumption of an information-symmetric system, wherein both the manufacturer and the contractor have full knowledge of the parameters needed for contract design. In this article, we relax the assumption and extend this model under an information-asymmetric system, wherein the manufacturer knows only limited information about one of the parameters, the contractor’s expected repair cost. We use two approaches to determine a menu of contracts, where the menu of contracts is often used in the presence of limited information. The first approach maximizes the manufacturer’s expected profit, and the second approach maximizes the system’s expected profit. Our analytical and numerical comparisons of the two approaches show that the second approach is not only robust with respect to the estimated probability of the expected repair cost, but also more acceptable to the manufacturer than the first approach when a Black Swan event is possible, which occurs with small probability in a context where the contractor’s expected repair cost is large.

Suggested Citation

  • Andy Alexander & Yanjun Li & Robert Plante, 2023. "Comparative study of two menus of contracts for outsourcing the maintenance function of a process having a linear failure rate," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 1230-1241, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:55:y:2023:i:12:p:1230-1241
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2023.2175939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2023.2175939
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2023.2175939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:55:y:2023:i:12:p:1230-1241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.