IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v54y2022i12p1199-1210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brick-and-mortar or brick-and-click? The influence of online customer reviews on a retailer’s channel strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Fei Ye
  • Lunhai Liang
  • Yang Tong
  • Guangyi Xu
  • Zefei Xie

Abstract

Adding an online channel generates more information about consumers’ preferences for particular products (e.g., through online customer reviews), and this information can be used to forecast demand more precisely. In this article, we investigate the influence of online customer reviews on a retailer’s decision to add to its physical store channel an online channel with a supply chain consisting of that of a brick-and-mortar retailer and a third-party logistics provider. We find the retailer’s optimal channel strategy (store only or online plus store) will be jointly affected by the additional cost of establishing an online channel, the increase in market size that is attained by adding the online channel, as well as the additional value of information revealed by online customer reviews. Interestingly, under both differentiated and uniform pricing strategies, when the fixed cost is moderate, the retailer benefits from adding an online channel if the additional value of information and the increase in market size exceed some thresholds; otherwise, doing so cannot increase the retailer’s profit. However, when online customer reviews exert two effects on updating demand uncertainty, negative (positive) customer reviews will reduce (increase) the value of information, and the retailer will be inhibited from adding (induced to add) an online channel. Moreover, a larger degree of risk aversion on the part of the retailer will inhibit the retailer from adding an online channel.

Suggested Citation

  • Fei Ye & Lunhai Liang & Yang Tong & Guangyi Xu & Zefei Xie, 2022. "Brick-and-mortar or brick-and-click? The influence of online customer reviews on a retailer’s channel strategy," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(12), pages 1199-1210, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:54:y:2022:i:12:p:1199-1210
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2022.2045045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2022.2045045
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2022.2045045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:54:y:2022:i:12:p:1199-1210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.