IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uhejxx/v93y2022i4p651-675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy in Theory and Policy in Practice: Community College Students’ Perceptions of Cross-Enrollment

Author

Listed:
  • Maritza Morales-Gracia
  • Joshua Dorman
  • Maricela Bañuelos
  • Elizabeth S. Park
  • Jennifer Cabrera
  • Loris Fagioli
  • Rachel B. Baker

Abstract

Most community college (CC) students nationwide aspire to transfer from CC to a 4-year baccalaureate granting institution, yet most students who aspire to transfer never achieve this goal. Cross-enrollment, facilitated enrollment in a course at a four-year college while simultaneously enrolled in classes at a CC, is one policy that may increase transfer rates. Our study is motivated by low uptake of this opportunity. We conducted 12 semi-structured focus groups with a diverse sample of California CC students to understand their perceptions related to cross-enrollment opportunities. Three themes emerged from our study: (1) cross-enrollment information is inaccessible, (2) sense of belonging and self-efficacy influence student perceptions of cross-enrollment, and (3) cross-enrollment is met with both enthusiasm and apprehension. We discuss the challenges and benefits to cross-enrollment that students consider and several recommendations, suggested by students themselves, to reduce barriers to cross-enrollment and transfer pathways.

Suggested Citation

  • Maritza Morales-Gracia & Joshua Dorman & Maricela Bañuelos & Elizabeth S. Park & Jennifer Cabrera & Loris Fagioli & Rachel B. Baker, 2022. "Policy in Theory and Policy in Practice: Community College Students’ Perceptions of Cross-Enrollment," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 93(4), pages 651-675, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:93:y:2022:i:4:p:651-675
    DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2021.2010515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00221546.2021.2010515
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00221546.2021.2010515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:93:y:2022:i:4:p:651-675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.