IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uhejxx/v92y2021i3p363-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Constraints of Fear and Neutrality in Title IX Administrators’ Responses to Sexual Violence

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline Cruz

Abstract

Under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972—a federal civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in education—universities are responsible for both addressing and preventing sexual violence on their campuses. Despite the recent growth of Title IX offices, administrators, and policies aimed at preventing sexual violence on university campuses, many students describe reporting their sexual assaults to university administrators as one of the most traumatizing aspects of their experience. This study seeks to explain the disconnect between university efforts to respond to sexual violence and numerous reports of institutional betrayal by survivors. I report from interview data on university administrators’ experiences of creating and implementing Title IX policies. I argue that the fear of media and public scrutiny and the role of Title IX administrator as a “neutral” party constrain administrator’s decision-making abilities. As a result, well-intentioned administrators tasked with protecting gender equality, may subtly reproduce a system that further marginalizes women and their experiences of sexual violence. This study sheds new light on how universities are responding to sexual violence.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline Cruz, 2021. "The Constraints of Fear and Neutrality in Title IX Administrators’ Responses to Sexual Violence," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 92(3), pages 363-384, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:92:y:2021:i:3:p:363-384
    DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2020.1809268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00221546.2020.1809268
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00221546.2020.1809268?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:92:y:2021:i:3:p:363-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.