IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugtixx/v38y2023i2p139-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A phenomenological study exploring white teachers’ potential for cross-cultural talent recognition within charter and magnet schools

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Worley
  • Meg E. Hines

Abstract

Research in urban and gifted education has often highlighted the underrepresentation of certain student groups in gifted programs due to factors such as insufficient teacher training and educational quality. However, a significant factor contributing to this underrepresentation is teacher bias. There's a noted tendency of teachers to under-refer Black and Brown students while more easily identifying giftedness in White students. The impact of teacher bias on the identification process, especially against Black and Brown students, is a known challenge. There is limited research on culturally competent teachers who challenge their biases. This pilot study seeks to fill the research gap by exploring the contributions of White teachers who informally identify gifted Black and Brown students in schools without formal gifted identification processes, or where all students are considered gifted. This study delves into these teachers' cultural backgrounds, experiences, and attitudes to understand how they recognize talent in underrepresented groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Worley & Meg E. Hines, 2023. "A phenomenological study exploring white teachers’ potential for cross-cultural talent recognition within charter and magnet schools," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 139-148, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:38:y:2023:i:2:p:139-148
    DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2023.2245015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15332276.2023.2245015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15332276.2023.2245015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:38:y:2023:i:2:p:139-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.