IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugtixx/v31y2016i2p73-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elementary students’ perceptions of their classroom activities in China: A validation study

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Yang
  • Marcia Gentry
  • Jiaxi Wu
  • Enyi Jen
  • Yukiko Maeda

Abstract

This study is to investigate whether My Class Activities (MCA; Gentry & Gable, 2001a), an instrument developed to measure students’ perceptions of their classroom activities, yields valid data when used with elementary students in China after translation into Chinese. The four factors measured by the instrument (Interest, Challenge, Choice, and Enjoyment) are related closely to students’ motivation and optimal learning as described in Chinese literature. Data from 943 elementary students from a school in mid-China were used in the analyses from an elementary school. Confirmatory factor analyses showed that a four correlated factor model with all 31 items was not a good fit to the data. Factor loadings were checked, and two items were removed from the “challenge” factor. A second four correlated factor model with 29 items generated better goodness-of-fit indices. Measurement equivalence of this model was tested between the Chinese and the U.S. sample of 943 students randomly selected from the original normative sample of the MCA. Results indicated partial measurement invariance of the revised instrument. Further research was suggested with implications for practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Yang & Marcia Gentry & Jiaxi Wu & Enyi Jen & Yukiko Maeda, 2016. "Elementary students’ perceptions of their classroom activities in China: A validation study," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 73-87, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:31:y:2016:i:2:p:73-87
    DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2016.1255095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15332276.2016.1255095
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15332276.2016.1255095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:31:y:2016:i:2:p:73-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.