IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugtixx/v24y2009i2p139-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Giftedness Perceptions and Practices of Teachers in Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Monita Leavitt
  • John Geake

Abstract

This article reports on two of the first studies of post-Soviet reforms of gifted education in Lithuania. After a professional development (PD) programme was provided Lithuanian teachers to help them develop a list of characteristics of gifted children, define giftedness, and design a procedure for gifted identification, two qualitative studies examined: a) how teachers’ perceptions of giftedness changed as a result of a Western professional development programme in gifted education that introduced the Renzulli Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness; and b) what gifted educational practices do teachers in an urban basic school know, practice, and recommend after the implementation of a systematic gifted identification process. Evidence for change in teachers’ perceptions was gathered via pre-and post-surveys. In the follow-up case study at a basic school, the Screening Committee identified 19% or 84 of 450 pupils as ’gifted.’ Observational and interview data from the case study school indicated that teachers from the PD programme felt more empowered to differentiate the curriculum for identified gifted pupils.(1) How have the Lithuanian teachers’ perceptions of giftedness changed as a result of a Western professional development programme in gifted education that introduced the Renzulli Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness Model?(2) What gifted educational practices do Lithuanian teachers in an urban basic school know, practice, and recommend after the implementation of a systematic gifted identification process?

Suggested Citation

  • Monita Leavitt & John Geake, 2009. "Giftedness Perceptions and Practices of Teachers in Lithuania," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 139-148, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:24:y:2009:i:2:p:139-148
    DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2009.11673536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15332276.2009.11673536
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15332276.2009.11673536?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:24:y:2009:i:2:p:139-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.