IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugtixx/v19y2004i1p15-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes of American and English Preservice Teachers Toward Gifted Learners

Author

Listed:
  • Cheryll M. Adams
  • Rebecca L. Pierce

Abstract

At a time when proponents of reform call for teachers to be ready to teach all children well, the needs of academically diverse learners are of primary concern. In striving for equity without sacrificing excellence, we must attend to the individual and diverse needs of all students. In order to educate well, we must teach to the individual rather than to the ambiguous "average" student. Since teacher attitudes can facilitate or impede this process, it is critical to understand the attitudes teachers hold toward academically diverse learners in general and gifted learners in particular. Of primary importance is a measure of these attitudes during the teacher preparation program.To investigate the issue of preservice teachers’ attitudes toward academically diverse learners and to discern areas of agreement/disagreement with respect to gifted learners, this study addressed the following research questions:1. What kind of attitudes (positive, negative, neutral) do preservice teachers hold toward gifted learners in particular?2. What similarities/differences are there in the responses of American and English preservice teachers on questions dealing specifically with gifted learners?Results indicate the responses given by both groups to the questions regarding gifted students were quite similar for most of the questions, even when questions did not reflect a positive attitude. Consensus was unexpected since one group had very little exposure to academically diverse learners while the other group’s training included more attention to the needs of academically diverse learners.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheryll M. Adams & Rebecca L. Pierce, 2004. "Attitudes of American and English Preservice Teachers Toward Gifted Learners," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 15-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:19:y:2004:i:1:p:15-23
    DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2004.11673028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15332276.2004.11673028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15332276.2004.11673028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:19:y:2004:i:1:p:15-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.