IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uaajxx/v4y2000i3p109-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remarks on “Financial Services Integration: Right for some, Wrong for Others?”

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Smith

Abstract

I have been asked to provide some introductory remarks on the structure of the financial services industry in the 21st century. Each of the panelists will give their own unique perspective on why consolidation is or is not a good idea for the firms where they work. I, on the other hand, would like to take a little time to provide an overview of what I see as competing “models” for the delivery of financial services. I will try to argue that these models are not necessarily mutually exclusive and that certain clientele may be attracted to one or the other. Thus, integration will indeed turn out to be right for some and wrong for others.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Smith, 2000. "Remarks on “Financial Services Integration: Right for some, Wrong for Others?”," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 109-110.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:4:y:2000:i:3:p:109-110
    DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2000.10595927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10920277.2000.10595927
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10920277.2000.10595927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Korhonen, Pekka & Koskinen, Lasse & Voutilainen, Raimo, 2006. "A financial alliance compromise between executives and supervisory authorities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 1300-1310, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:4:y:2000:i:3:p:109-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.