IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uaajxx/v27y2023i1p47-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mortality Improvement Rates: Modeling, Parameter Uncertainty, and Robustness

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Hunt
  • Andrés M. Villegas

Abstract

Rather than looking at mortality rates directly, a number of recent academic studies have looked at modeling rates of improvement in mortality when making mortality projections. Although relatively new in the academic literature, the use of mortality improvement rates has a long-standing tradition in actuarial practice when allowing for improvements in mortality from standard mortality tables. However, mortality improvement rates are difficult to estimate robustly, and models of them are subject to high levels of parameter uncertainty, because they are derived by dividing one uncertain quantity by another. Despite this, the studies of mortality improvement rates to date have not investigated parameter uncertainty due to the ad hoc methods used to fit the models to historical data. In this study, we adapt the Poisson model for the numbers of deaths at each age and year proposed in Brouhns, Denuit, and Vermunt to model mortality improvement rates. This enables models of improvement rates to be fitted using standard maximum likelihood techniques and allows parameter uncertainty to be investigated using a standard bootstrapping approach. We illustrate the proposed modeling approach using data for the England and Wales population. The methods used in this article are available in the R package iMoMo.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Hunt & Andrés M. Villegas, 2023. "Mortality Improvement Rates: Modeling, Parameter Uncertainty, and Robustness," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 47-73, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:27:y:2023:i:1:p:47-73
    DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2021.2006068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10920277.2021.2006068
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10920277.2021.2006068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:27:y:2023:i:1:p:47-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.