IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uaajxx/v26y2022i2p298-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Medical Underwriters in Life Settlements: Problem of Unreported Deaths

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Beng Lim
  • Nariankadu D. Shyamalkumar

Abstract

The valuation of policies in the life settlement market hinges upon life expectancy assessments provided by medical underwriters. Because accurate assessments are essential to the market functioning well, determining so is of interest to various stakeholders, including regulatory bodies. As a third party to settlement transactions, these underwriters, and hence their auditors, have to rely on public sources in compiling mortality data on underwritten insureds. Such acquired data are known to contain a significant proportion of unreported deaths. Accurate accounting for their presence is crucial to a fair evaluation of an underwriter’s methodology. However, existing methods for doing so either rely solely on actuarial opinion or are based on assumptions untenable in the life settlement context. Toward developing a practical data-driven methodology for consistently estimating mortality in the presence of unreported deaths, we propose the IBNR (incurred but not reported) rate model. This adaptation of the cure rate model accommodates the heterogeneity in the rates of both mortality and unreported deaths seen in practice. Our methodology thus facilitates an accurate and objective evaluation of an underwriter.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Beng Lim & Nariankadu D. Shyamalkumar, 2022. "Evaluating Medical Underwriters in Life Settlements: Problem of Unreported Deaths," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 298-322, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:26:y:2022:i:2:p:298-322
    DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2021.1927109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10920277.2021.1927109
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10920277.2021.1927109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:26:y:2022:i:2:p:298-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.