IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tstfxx/v6y2022i4p265-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical likelihood inference and goodness-of-fit test for logistic regression model under two-phase case-control sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Sheng
  • Yukun Liu
  • Jing Qin

Abstract

Due to cost-effectiveness and high efficiency, two-phase case-control sampling has been widely used in epidemiology studies. We develop a semi-parametric empirical likelihood approach to two-phase case-control data under the logistic regression model. We show that the maximum empirical likelihood estimator has an asymptotically normal distribution, and the empirical likelihood ratio follows an asymptotically central chi-square distribution. We find that the maximum empirical likelihood estimator is equal to Breslow and Holubkov (1997)'s maximum likelihood estimator. Even so, the limiting distribution of the likelihood ratio, likelihood-ratio-based interval, and test are all new. Furthermore, we construct new Kolmogorov–Smirnov type goodness-of-fit tests to test the validation of the underlying logistic regression model. Our simulation results and a real application show that the likelihood-ratio-based interval and test have certain merits over the Wald-type counterparts and that the proposed goodness-of-fit test is valid.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Sheng & Yukun Liu & Jing Qin, 2022. "Empirical likelihood inference and goodness-of-fit test for logistic regression model under two-phase case-control sampling," Statistical Theory and Related Fields, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 265-276, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tstfxx:v:6:y:2022:i:4:p:265-276
    DOI: 10.1080/24754269.2021.1946373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24754269.2021.1946373
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24754269.2021.1946373?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tstfxx:v:6:y:2022:i:4:p:265-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tstf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.