IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tstfxx/v4y2020i2p135-145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interval estimation for minimal clinically important difference and its classification error via a bootstrap scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Zehua Zhou
  • Jiwei Zhao
  • Melissa Kluczynski

Abstract

With the improved knowledge on clinical relevance and more convenient access to the patient-reported outcome data, clinical researchers prefer to adopt minimal clinically important difference (MCID) rather than statistical significance as a testing standard to examine the effectiveness of certain intervention or treatment in clinical trials. A practical method to determining the MCID is based on the diagnostic measurement. By using this approach, the MCID can be formulated as the solution of a large margin classification problem. However, this method only produces the point estimation, hence lacks ways to evaluate its performance. In this paper, we introduce an m-out-of-n bootstrap approach which provides the interval estimations for MCID and its classification error, an associated accuracy measure for performance assessment. A variety of extensive simulation studies are implemented to show the advantages of our proposed method. Analysis of the chondral lesions and meniscus procedures (ChAMP) trial is our motivating example and is used to illustrate our method.

Suggested Citation

  • Zehua Zhou & Jiwei Zhao & Melissa Kluczynski, 2020. "Interval estimation for minimal clinically important difference and its classification error via a bootstrap scheme," Statistical Theory and Related Fields, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 135-145, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tstfxx:v:4:y:2020:i:2:p:135-145
    DOI: 10.1080/24754269.2019.1587692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24754269.2019.1587692
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24754269.2019.1587692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tstfxx:v:4:y:2020:i:2:p:135-145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tstf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.