IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transr/v43y2023i6p1263-1285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shared e-scooter rider safety behaviour and injury outcomes: a review of studies in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Emma G. P. Sexton
  • Katherine J. Harmon
  • Rebecca L. Sanders
  • Nitesh R. Shah
  • Meg Bryson
  • Charles T. Brown
  • Christopher R. Cherry

Abstract

Electric scooters (e-scooters) have proliferated throughout North American cities in the past five years, with about 60 million shared e-scooter trips taken in 2021. That growth has resulted in safety and injury prevention challenges, and much of the regulatory approach has been to limit e-scooter use through technological or behavioural interventions. The past few years have yielded a patchwork of regulations based on a diversity of published safety and injury studies, including work on injury burden (e.g. hospitalisation studies), direct observation, rider surveys, or traffic crash (e.g. police-reported crash) analysis. This review draws from disparate studies to develop systematic policy conclusions related primarily to rider safety behaviour and associated injury outcomes, particularly severe injuries. This work focuses on perceived safety, demographics of scooter riders, injury trends of riders, temporal and spatial correlates of shared e-scooter rider injuries and contributing factors like roadway design, impairment, and helmets. While this review focuses on studies that occurred in the United States, some findings transfer elsewhere. The sum of the literature points to the importance of enhanced and maintained infrastructure to improve rider behaviour, predictability, and perceived safety, and increases in driver and e-scooter user education and enforcement to reduce violations and impairment.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma G. P. Sexton & Katherine J. Harmon & Rebecca L. Sanders & Nitesh R. Shah & Meg Bryson & Charles T. Brown & Christopher R. Cherry, 2023. "Shared e-scooter rider safety behaviour and injury outcomes: a review of studies in the United States," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 1263-1285, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:43:y:2023:i:6:p:1263-1285
    DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2023.2219838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01441647.2023.2219838
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01441647.2023.2219838?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transr:v:43:y:2023:i:6:p:1263-1285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TTRV20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.