IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v56y2018i5p1960-1981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal reservation pricing strategy for a fashion supply chain with forecast update and asymmetric cost information

Author

Listed:
  • Danqin Yang
  • Tiaojun Xiao
  • Tsan-Ming Choi
  • T.C.E. Cheng

Abstract

We address the reservation pricing problem for a two-echelon fashion supply chain in which the downstream manufacturer with private information on its operations cost (low or high type) reserves the capacity for a critical component from the upstream supplier before placing the final order. We consider the case when the demand forecast is partially updated. We find that a novel menu of reservation contracts containing the unit reservation fee with reservation quantity and final order could induce the manufacturer to reveal its operations cost information truthfully. We also show that the supplier should require less capacity reservation and charge a lower unit reservation fee if it has asymmetric information about the manufacturer’s operations cost. Finally, we analyse the effects of forecast update, and our results indicate that: (i) the supplier benefits from forecast update because the optimal reservation pricing strategy is designed to reveal the true information and meanwhile induce a higher capacity reservation; and (ii) a greater amount of forecast update decreases the supply chain deficit and increases the supplier’s agency cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Danqin Yang & Tiaojun Xiao & Tsan-Ming Choi & T.C.E. Cheng, 2018. "Optimal reservation pricing strategy for a fashion supply chain with forecast update and asymmetric cost information," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(5), pages 1960-1981, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:56:y:2018:i:5:p:1960-1981
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2014.998789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2014.998789
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2014.998789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Luo, Suyuan, 2019. "Data quality challenges for sustainable fashion supply chain operations in emerging markets: Roles of blockchain, government sponsors and environment taxes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 139-152.
    2. Matsui, Kenji, 2019. "A supply chain member should set its margin later if another member's cost is highly uncertain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 127-138.
    3. Shaojian Qu & Yefan Han & Zhong Wu & Hassan Raza, 2021. "Consensus Modeling with Asymmetric Cost Based on Data-Driven Robust Optimization," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 1395-1432, December.
    4. Saskia Manshoven & Wim Van Opstal, 2022. "The Carrot or the Stick? Stakeholder Support for Mandatory Regulations towards a Circular Fashion System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-31, November.
    5. Sung-Moon Jung & Shie-Gheun Koh & Young-Jin Kim & Pyung-Hoi Koo, 2023. "Coordinated Supply Contracts for a Two-Echelon Supply Chain under Given Bargaining Powers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Jiawu Peng & Yue Zhao & Lili Dai, 2023. "Equilibrium Strategy of Production and Order in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Demand Information Updates and Capacity Restriction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-32, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:56:y:2018:i:5:p:1960-1981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.