IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v53y2015i3p695-717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating human factors in order picking planning models: framework and research opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Eric H. Grosse
  • Christoph H. Glock
  • Mohamad Y. Jaber
  • W. Patrick Neumann

Abstract

Order picking (OP) activities, essential to logistics operations, are laborious and time-intensive. Humans are central actors in the OP process and determine both OP effectiveness and efficiency. Many researchers have developed models for planning OP activities and increasing the efficiencies of such systems by suggesting different warehouse layouts, OP routes or storage assignments. These studies have, however, ignored workers’ characteristics, or human factors, suggesting that they cannot be substantiated, which led to only partially realistic results. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for integrating human factors into planning models of OP activities and hypothesises that doing so improves the performance of an OP system and workers’ welfare. The framework is based on a systematic literature review that synthesises findings documented in the OP and human factors literature. The results of the paper may assist researchers and practitioners in designing OP systems by developing planning models that help in enhancing performance and reducing long-term costs caused by work-related inefficiencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric H. Grosse & Christoph H. Glock & Mohamad Y. Jaber & W. Patrick Neumann, 2015. "Incorporating human factors in order picking planning models: framework and research opportunities," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 695-717, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:53:y:2015:i:3:p:695-717
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2014.919424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2014.919424
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2014.919424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:53:y:2015:i:3:p:695-717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.