IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v18y2020i1p93-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of aesthetic reasoning in knowledge management: the case of elegant systems architecture design

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Iandoli
  • Alejandro Salado
  • Giuseppe Zollo

Abstract

Nonaka and Takeuchi foundational work brought tacit knowledge to the attention of the Knowledge Management (KM) community. During the same years, research in cognitive science was offering new insights on how tacit knowledge operates by highlighting the role of visual perception and aesthetic appreciation. Despite these developments, the relationship between tacit knowledge and aesthetics has received scarce attention in KM literature. Drawing from studies in Neuro-Aesthetics, Gestalt psychology, Art critique and Design, we focus on the relationship between aesthetics and ambiguity resolution and adopt as empirical unit engineering systems representations. We show that more effective system representations can be achieved through the application of a set of aesthetic principles supporting the achievement of an optimal level of complexity in the representation (effective complexity). The empirical findings provide evidence that more aesthetically pleasant system representations built following this approach leads to the design of both more elegant and performant systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Iandoli & Alejandro Salado & Giuseppe Zollo, 2020. "The role of aesthetic reasoning in knowledge management: the case of elegant systems architecture design," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 93-109, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:93-109
    DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2019.1678410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14778238.2019.1678410
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14778238.2019.1678410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:93-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.