IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tkmrxx/v17y2019i2p227-244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulating the impacts of mutual trust on tacit knowledge transfer using agent-based modelling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Li
  • Changhong Li
  • Zhan Wang
  • Xinlan Li

Abstract

Effective transfer of tacit knowledge within an organization is the key issue to ensure its sustainable competitive advantage. However due to the asymmetric nature of information when transferring the tacit knowledge, there is a tendency for the moral hazard of information hiding to emerge, which hinders the effective transfer of tacit knowledge. According to the norm of reciprocity, we assume that the primary motivation of suppliers to transfer tacit knowledge is that the individuals who share their tacit knowledge trust the recipients can reciprocate in the future. In this paper, we build a simulation model based on trust and mutual benefit through the agent-based modeling and simulation. From the perspective of theoretical quantification, our simulation result shows that, the endowment effect, the initial trust between members and the minimum honesty are very important, which provides relevant practical guidance for organization managers in the context of tacit knowledge transfer.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Li & Changhong Li & Zhan Wang & Xinlan Li, 2019. "Simulating the impacts of mutual trust on tacit knowledge transfer using agent-based modelling approach," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 227-244, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:17:y:2019:i:2:p:227-244
    DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2019.1601506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14778238.2019.1601506
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14778238.2019.1601506?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:17:y:2019:i:2:p:227-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tkmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.