IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjsmxx/v4y2010i2p128-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis in discrete-event simulation using fractional factorial designs

Author

Listed:
  • J A B Montevechi
  • R G de Almeida Filho
  • A P Paiva
  • R F S Costa
  • A L Medeiros

Abstract

This paper presents a sensitivity analysis of discrete-event simulation models based on a twofold approach formed by Design of Experiments (DOE) factorial designs and simulation routines. This sensitivity analysis aim is to reduce the number of factors used as optimization input via simulation. The advantage of reducing the input factors is that optimum search can become very time-consuming as the number of factors increases. Two cases were used to illustrate the proposal: the first one, formed only by discrete variable, and the second presenting both discrete and continuous variables. The paper also shows the use of the Johnson's transformation to experiments with non-normal response variables. The specific case of the sensitivity analysis with a Poisson distribution response was studied. Generally, discrete probability distributions lead to violation of constant variance assumption, which is an important principle in DOE. Finally, a comparison between optimization conducted without planning and optimization based on sensitivity analysis results was carried out. The main conclusion of this work is that it is possible to reduce the number of runs needed to find optimum values, while generating a system knowledge capable to improve resource allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • J A B Montevechi & R G de Almeida Filho & A P Paiva & R F S Costa & A L Medeiros, 2010. "Sensitivity analysis in discrete-event simulation using fractional factorial designs," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 128-142, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:128-142
    DOI: 10.1057/jos.2009.23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/jos.2009.23
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/jos.2009.23?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:128-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjsm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.