IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjsmxx/v16y2022i3p312-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model credibility revisited: Concepts and considerations for appropriate trust

Author

Listed:
  • Levent Yilmaz
  • Bo Liu

Abstract

The increasing reliance of modern science in computer simulation demands appropriate trust in simulation models for credible results. Because of its foundations in operations research, model credibility is conventionally viewed from the lens of numerical and transformational accuracy. However, the exploratory use of models in scientific discovery, causal explanation, and strategic decision-making render this view incomplete. Recognising the significance of the cognitive interests of model users and the context-sensitive, adaptive nature of building confidence in scientific models, we characterise credibility as trust. Appropriate and justifiable trust is conceptualised as a dynamic, cognitive construct that evolves through interactive, experiential learning. Following the delineation of the dimensions and attributes of trust, conceptual foundations of a dynamic trust model, including alternative measurement strategies, are proposed. Guidelines for trustable models are elaborated to provide a basis for exploiting synergies between the cognitive models of trust and model evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Levent Yilmaz & Bo Liu, 2022. "Model credibility revisited: Concepts and considerations for appropriate trust," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 312-325, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:16:y:2022:i:3:p:312-325
    DOI: 10.1080/17477778.2020.1821587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17477778.2020.1821587
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17477778.2020.1821587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:16:y:2022:i:3:p:312-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjsm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.