IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v74y2023i5p1393-1405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing where to set the threshold between low- and high-risk patients: Evaluating a classification tool within a simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Christina E. Saville
  • Honora K. Smith
  • Katarzyna Bijak
  • Pauline Leonard

Abstract

Health service providers must balance the needs of high-risk patients who require urgent medical attention against those of lower-risk patients who require reassurance or less urgent medical care. Based on their characteristics, we developed a tool to classify patients as low- or high-risk, with correspondingly different patient pathways through a service. Rather than choosing the threshold between low- and high-risk patients solely considering classification accuracy, we demonstrate the use of discrete-event simulation to find the best threshold from an operational perspective as well. Moreover, the predictors in classification tools are often categorical, and may be inter-dependent. Defining joint distributions of these variables from empirical data assumes that missing combinations are impossible. Our new approach involves using Poisson regression to estimate the joint distributions in the underlying population. We demonstrate our methods on a practical example: setting the threshold between low- and high-risk patients with proposed different pathways through a breast diagnostic clinic.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina E. Saville & Honora K. Smith & Katarzyna Bijak & Pauline Leonard, 2023. "Choosing where to set the threshold between low- and high-risk patients: Evaluating a classification tool within a simulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(5), pages 1393-1405, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:5:p:1393-1405
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2096497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2022.2096497
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2022.2096497?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:5:p:1393-1405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.