IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v74y2023i1p33-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A group-based FMEA approach with dynamic heterogeneous social network consensus reaching model for uncertain reliability assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Decui Liang
  • Fangshun Li
  • Zeshui Xu

Abstract

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a systematic and multidisciplinary team-based reliability analysis technology used in various industries, which can alleviate the failure risk of products, systems and services. The experts are usually drawn from different departments or areas. Thus, it is important to promote the consensus of experts to produce a collective solution with a high degree of acceptability for reliability assessment of FMEA. Meanwhile, there may be social influence relationships between experts, i.e., their opinions can interact and evolve. Hence, this study first integrates group consensus-reaching mechanism into the FMEA approach. Then, according to the uncertainty and similarity of expert assessments of each risk factor of FMEA, heterogeneous social networks among experts are constructed for opinion interaction, which exactly describes the professional expertise and influence of experts. Considering the important role of opinion dynamics and social network dissemination, dynamic heterogeneous social network consensus reaching model (DHSNCRM) with the minimum adjustment distance is further designed to help experts reach a consensus and obtain the consentient priority of failure modes by using a two-stage feedback process. Finally, a case study of reliability management of the intelligent minimally invasive medical equipment system is presented to verify the effectiveness of our proposed FMEA method.

Suggested Citation

  • Decui Liang & Fangshun Li & Zeshui Xu, 2023. "A group-based FMEA approach with dynamic heterogeneous social network consensus reaching model for uncertain reliability assessment," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(1), pages 33-47, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:1:p:33-47
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2021.2020694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2021.2020694
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2021.2020694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:1:p:33-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.