IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v74y2023i11p2418-2431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The max-reward and min-penalty frontier: A benchmark for research of supply and demand mismatches

Author

Listed:
  • Chun Sun
  • Sheng Ang
  • Fangqing Wei
  • Feng Yang

Abstract

The traditional production-oriented frontier in data envelopment analysis is defective in dealing with supply and demand mismatches, where the emphasis is placed on mismatches between input and supply as well as output and demand, instead of simply how input is used to produce output. Previous techniques to evaluate demand effectiveness and supply-demand effectiveness limited the value ranges of penalty parameters and thus failed to consider some extreme situations. To fill this gap, we abandon the traditional concept of frontier and map production units into a new type of frontier. Supply and demand mismatches can increase production costs but can also bring extra revenues in some situations; these outcomes are called penalty and reward, respectively. We map the production possibility set onto a dataset of input and output penalties, namely, the reward/penalty possibility set. A new frontier, called the max-reward and min-penalty frontier, is provided as the benchmark to evaluate decision-making units’ performance in supply management and demand fulfilment and accordingly define reward-penalty effectiveness. Much further research can be done based on this new frontier.

Suggested Citation

  • Chun Sun & Sheng Ang & Fangqing Wei & Feng Yang, 2023. "The max-reward and min-penalty frontier: A benchmark for research of supply and demand mismatches," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(11), pages 2418-2431, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:11:p:2418-2431
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2150575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2022.2150575
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2022.2150575?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:11:p:2418-2431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.