IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v74y2023i10p2165-2186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consensus-driven methodology to managing diversity and complex linguistic ratings in quality function deployment: An optimization-based approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Xiao
  • Xiuli Wang
  • Bowen Zhang
  • Hengjie Zhang

Abstract

Quality function deployment (QFD) is a quality management tool that can effectively transform customer requirements (CRs) into engineering characteristics (ECs) of services or products. It is a crucial process to determine the prioritization of ECs from the assessments of the relationship between CRs and ECs in QFD. This study designs several optimization models to derive the consensual prioritization of ECs from the diverse and complex assessments, in which the assessments of QFD team members are modelled by comparative linguistic expressions (CLEs). First, a consensus-driven optimization model (CDOM) is presented to manage CLEs by transforming them into linguistic distribution assessments. Then, a minimum adjustment element consensus model (MAECM) is developed to derive the consensual assessments by minimizing the number of adjustment elements between the members’ original and adjusted assessments. Following this, a technique for order preference by the similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) based method is used to derive the prioritization of ECs from the consensual assessments. A case study regarding the improvement of window services in the Bank of JT Shanghai Branch is proposed to illustrate the implementation of the presented method. The comparative analysis shows that the presented method outperforms previous methods in managing CLEs and consensus.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Xiao & Xiuli Wang & Bowen Zhang & Hengjie Zhang, 2023. "Consensus-driven methodology to managing diversity and complex linguistic ratings in quality function deployment: An optimization-based approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(10), pages 2165-2186, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:10:p:2165-2186
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2129482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2022.2129482
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2022.2129482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:10:p:2165-2186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.