IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjorxx/v69y2018i8p1286-1308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The rôle of knowledge in system risk identification and assessment: The 2014 Ebola outbreak

Author

Listed:
  • John H. Powell
  • Navonil Mustafee
  • Colin S. Brown

Abstract

Current approaches to risk management stress the need for dynamic approaches to risk identification aimed at reducing the expected consequences of undesired outcomes. We contend that these approaches place insufficient emphasis on the system knowledge available to the assessor, particularly in respect of three related factors, namely the dynamic behaviour of the system under threat, the role of human agents and the knowledge availability to those agents. In this paper, we address the rôle of knowledge use and availability in critical human activity systems. We emphasise two distinctions: that between information and knowledge used in these systems, and that between knowledge about the system and knowledge deployed within it, the latter forming part of the system itself. Using the ongoing 2014–2015 West African Ebola outbreak as an example, we offer a practical procedure using the well-known systems dynamics technique in its qualitative form for the identification of risks and appropriate policies for managing those risks.

Suggested Citation

  • John H. Powell & Navonil Mustafee & Colin S. Brown, 2018. "The rôle of knowledge in system risk identification and assessment: The 2014 Ebola outbreak," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(8), pages 1286-1308, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:69:y:2018:i:8:p:1286-1308
    DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2017.1392404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2017.1392404
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01605682.2017.1392404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:69:y:2018:i:8:p:1286-1308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.