IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjisxx/v8y1999i4p284-293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The illusion of ‘best practice’ in information systems for operations management

Author

Listed:
  • J Swan
  • S Newell
  • M Robertson

Abstract

This paper explores the adoption of information systems (IS) for operations management by manufacturing firms in four European countries. The notion of ‘best practice’ in information systems for operations management, as presented by technology suppliers (i.e. plain vanilla implementation of standard packages) is shown to be both illusory and potentially disruptive. In reality, firms usually reconfigure systems in order to use them effectively within their unique contexts. It is argued that the reason for this difference between technology supplier prescription of ‘best practice’ and user adoption of IS is because of the different interests of these two groups. Tensions exist at the interface between users who have unique manufacturing problems and demand flexible or customised information systems, and technology suppliers who have interests in promoting and supporting standardised solutions or methodologies. User firms need to recognise and address these tensions early when thinking about IS design.

Suggested Citation

  • J Swan & S Newell & M Robertson, 1999. "The illusion of ‘best practice’ in information systems for operations management," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 284-293, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:8:y:1999:i:4:p:284-293
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000336
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000336?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:8:y:1999:i:4:p:284-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.